Thursday, September 18, 2008

Westchester Guardian/The Court Report.

Thursday, September 18, 2008

The Court Report
By Richard Blassberg

At Long Last, Justice For Bobrowsky
Yonkers City Court
Judge Michael A. Martinelli Presiding

Last Tuesday morning, September 9th, in Judge Michael A. Martinelli’s Court, Yonkers City Court, had been essentially unremarkable for the
first two hours; unremarkable in that Judge Martinelli had handled the usual stream of DWI, Drug Possession, Assault, Menacing, etc., cases with the thoughtful judicial temperament and dedication this observer had seen any number of times from him.

At 11:20am, the Judge announced, “The Court will be in recess for 20 minutes. We will be handling the Bobrowsky case.” Assistant District Attorney Paul Stein had been sent down from White Plains and now entered the courtroom. Attorney Anthony John Messina, of White Plains, representing Sherry Bobrowsky, of Yonkers, now addressed the Court. He told Martinelli, “I’m seeking a modification of the Order of Protection issued by this Court. The Order stipulated that my client was to stay away from the house. The question is, who owns the house? It’s been determined that my client does.”

Judge Martinelli asked, “Has there been an eviction?”

Messina responded, “My application is for a modification because this is a family matter that has been blown way out of proportion.” Referring to
Dr. Sherry Bobrowsky, he went on, “She can’t even get her mail. She has no place to live. Her brother, Jacques, doesn’t even live in the house.”
Pausing for a moment, Messina went on, “For two and a half years, Your Honor, the People have, in effect, put this woman out of her home.”
Martinelli then reminded Messina that his client had an open pro se application before the Court, asking, “She’s not withdrawing the motion now?” Messina then turned to Bobrowsky, privately conferenced with her, and turned back to Martinelli, responding, “Your Honor, she’s agreed to withdraw them now.”

Then, Martinelli turned to ADA Stein, asking, “What’s the People’s position on the modification of the Permanent Order of Protection?”

Stein responded, “She was given an Order to stay away from her 82-year old mother. There was a first Criminal Contempt Order, and a second Criminal Contempt Order. The victim in this case is elderly.”

Stein went on, “Ownership is irrelevant to the Order of Protection.” He then tried to make an argument that Sherry Bobrowsky’s relationship with
her mother Lillian was analogous to a relationship between spouses, with elements of domestic violence under one roof. Reading from the Order of Protection, he declared, “This Defendant is to stay away from Lillian Bobrowsky and her home.”

At that point, Mr. Messina came back with, “Your Honor, I think we can call that a jurisdictional defect. This is how we got here, staring at her mother while her brother was sitting right next to her.” Judge Martinelli then observed, “It’s a Misdemeanor Complaint.” Messina followed with, “My first notion.” Martinelli then inquired, “Where are we now with regard to the non-jury trial?” Messina replied, “Judge, you can leave it on for this Thursday if they wish to.”

The Judge replied, “I’m going to withhold my action on the modification of the Order of Protection pending the outcome of the non-jury trial.”


Sherry Bobrowsky was finally before a judge, perhaps the only judge in the City Courts of Yonkers worthy of the title. She had been before Klein
and Wood and Duffy and had not been treated with the proper respect due any citizen in her situation. Her experience in the Yonkers City Courts had been one of callous and, in some instance, belligerent treatment by police, City Corporate Counsel, assistant district attorneys, and judges alike.
It had been clear and unjustifiable prejudice for more than two years, that supported and played into the hands of a brother with serious mental
health issues, represented by an attorney, Herbert N. Posner, who had been disbarred some 20 years ago for fraudulent practices, and this year, had lost his Notary license, also for fraud.

Now things were different; she was before a judge who was clearly a gentleman, Michael A. Martinelli, someone who would actually wield his powers with compassion and fairness; one who would approach her circumstances and those of her brother and 82-year-old incapacitated mother even-handedly, in a genuine effort to hopefully resolve matters.

Dr. Bobrowsky had been to Federal Court, appearing before Judge Stephen C. Robinson several months earlier, in an attempt to prevail upon him to intercede in the series of unconstitutional violations by the Yonkers Police and Corporate Counsel, the Westchester District Attorney’s Office, and Yonkers City Courts, who, acting in concert, had been ganging up on her, aiding and abetting a very transparent effort by Posner to deny her Constitutional Right to enjoy her own property, her home, her disability income, even the privacy and possession of her mail.

Unfortunately, Robinson found that he could not grant her the relief sought, by reason of jurisdictional failure. Bobrowsky had succeeded, however,
in State Supreme Court under Judge Richard Liebowitz, in getting a favorable determination with respect to her ownership and clear title to her Yonkers home, despite a fraudulent attempt by Attorney Posner in connection with Judicial Title Insurance Company, to file a deed outside of the chain of title.

She would be appearing again Wednesday and Thursday, September 10th and 11th, before Judge Martinelli; Thursday to answer to recent
allegations by Yonkers Police that she had violated a Permanent Order of Protection by being in the vicinity of her aged mother on June 2nd, when, in fact, she had been in the company of Attorney Mayo Bartlett, nowhere near her mother.

On Wednesday morning, September 10th, Dr. Bobrowsky was back before Judge Martinelli; this time in answer to an Order To Show Cause
filed by Attorney Posner with regard to a Default Judgment issued against his client, Bobrowsky’s mother Lillian, with respect to an eviction notification. Her mother and brother were present in Court, together with Posner. As he had done once before in State Supreme Court, Posner claimed that he wasn’t served by the Court and that Attorney Messina should have served him.

Martinelli ruled that the responsibility for notice lay with the Court. He asked what Posner’s argument was in light of his failure to show up. Posner declared, “It’s in the papers,” claiming that what Messina verified wasn’t true, asking for a recess to research the Real Property Law.
It turned out that Messina was right.

People v Sherry Bobrowsky

Thursday afternoon, September 11th, Dr. Bobrowsky appeared, once more, in Yonkers City Court before Judge Martinelli; this time to answer
to charges by the Westchester District Attorney’s Office. Martinelli opened, asking, “What’s happening on this?” The Assistant District
Attorney responded, “Judge, I’m serving a superceding Misdemeanor Complaint with respect to the June 2nd incident.”

Attorney Messina replied, “Your Honor, they’ve announced readiness but they don’t provide a certified copy.” Martinelli responded, “You will be
getting a certified copy today.” He then asked Messina, “How do you plan to proceed? You’ve waived the right to a jury trial.”

At that point, Messina asked, “Judge, may we approach?” And Messina and the Assistant District Attorney approached the Bench. Returning from a brief conference, Messina announced, “Judge, we prefer actual notice.” The ADA then indicated to the Court that he would prefer more time.
Martinelli then responded, “Based on what?” The ADA indicated that he wanted to involve the Domestic Violence Unit. Martinelli then set September 25th, at 2pm, for trial. Turning to Bobrowsky, he asked, “Ms. Bobrowsky, do you understand that in requesting a non-jury trial the Judge will sit as Judge and Trier of Fact?” She acknowledged that she understood. Closing the criminal hearing, Martinelli moved right along to handle the civil matter.

Sherry Bobrowsky v Jacques and Lillian Bobrowsky

Judge Martinelli opened with, “Let’s start off by being off-the-record. Is there any hope of resolution of the differences between the parties?”
Posner, speaking in a discouraging tone, told the Court, “We’ve tried.” Martinelli then told Posner, “Let’s assume Ms. Bobrowsky proceeds to
evict your clients.” At that point, Posner began to double- talk about events in Supreme Court under Judge Richard Liebowitz. He emphasized that Lillian had lived in the house for 62 years.

Going back on the record, Martinelli said, “So we are here on the Landlord/Tenant matter, and we will proceed with that.” At that point Attorney
Messina handed papers to Posner. Posner then asked for a “stay to allow sufficient time for Lillian to file a Show Cause Motion.” He went on to tell the Judge, “When the Order of Protection was drawn up in Family Court, there was a subsequent altercation which was established by a jury of her peers.”

Following brief arguments, Martinelli told Attorney Posner, “I’m going to deny your Order To Show Cause. I’m going to issue an Order and sign the warrant, with a 14-day Stay.”


The 14-day Stay was included because they were all scheduled to be back in Court on the 25th of September. Now that Judge Martinelli has effectively consolidated and taken over all of Dr. Bobrowsky’s court issues, there is realistic hope that she will soon reoccupy her home and normalize her life.


sherry said...

Tomorrow is my birthday...THREE years since the YONNKERS JUDGES even let me say I love you to my 81 yewar young mom. Judge MArtinelli issued a FIVE year order of protection for me to NEVER see my deasr mom again after OFFICER Renzi retaliated agasint me for reporting him for misconduct. I was arrested for my FACE. Yonkers took me, a disabled GOOD person who loves my family and destroyed all that a person can live for....all that is left is my air to breathe and I await that last right to be taken also. HOw a FACE can be a crime, and when I called 911 for help and then decided the police should not come....RENZI came and declared my face a crime. Yonkers has now DELAYED any chance for appeal for over THREE years.....there is not one judge that can fairly hear me. Even Judge MArtinelli is conflicted out since I sued the Yonkers court before the trial and before he sentenced me for my face. Adult protective services asked an 81 year old woman are you afraid? Period. No investigation, never a question to me. Rather than evalu8ate the FAMILY or question each person, I was destroyed due to the deep hate that persons like Laurence Porcari hold....he is the rep of thye Yonkers Corporation counsel and an ex -thrid precinct officer.....Porcari wanted $10,000 bail for me becaseuy I reported a third preceinct officer and asked for a judge to be recused......Judge Wood said he has asked for higher amounts and condoned Mr.Porcari as did the WEstchester DA. Funy, I treated many of the city employees and judges, and police......I never heard a complaint before...ever.
All I want is to meet with my family and for Yonkers and the Supreme court to prosecute attorney Herbert N. Posner who committed title fraud on my home and who DESTROYED myt family. The mayor of Yonekrs refuses to even sent ME my tax bills and property mail.....Posner gets it.....this is a TAKING of my home and I see not one person standing up for entity oversees title agency fraud......JAIL would have been over.....I invite any attroeny or advocate to contact me...please help me. disabled victim o9f fraud, Sherry

Anonymous said...

I have found that this judge Micheal Marinelli has now found a woman by the name of Carrie Mendez not guilty of charging on to private property and assaulting a 73 year old woman and her daughter and biting the womans daughter breast a total lack of responsibility to act in proper manner and follow the law. When there was three witnesses that gave testimony as to what happened. To find this woman not guilty allows for anyone to go on to someone property and assualt them at any given time therefore we in the County of Westchester will never be safe with a "JUDGE" and a system so corrupt that the people who live here have to be scared of where they call home.

Anonymous said...

sherry they are all corrupt all every last one of them and they dont follow the law they have no one to answer to because they all are brought and paid for including the whole da's office i would love to hear from all of westchester we need to get up and get a group together to finally put an end to this corruption imagine i just read about the 73 year old woman and that is just NOT acceptable so Judge Martinelli would you like your mother hit or abused by this Mendez woman well i wouldnt want my mom so i pray that its yours not mine that gets it first cause with rulings like this that makes gangs grow!!!!

sherry bobrowsky said...

Can anyone help me as a victim of title fraud and mortgage fraud? The attonrey who unduly influenced and suborned perjury in my elderly mom, was found guilty by the NYS Dept. of State. The DA is federally funded to help me as a vctim but they STILL refuse. The DA had told my prior attorneys Anthony Mangone and Santangelo to threaten me saying if I did not sign over my deed that they could indict a ham sandwich. I noticed that many real estate firms and companies have made large donations to Mayor Amicone and DA DiFiore.My home was sold in a tax lien sale to a friend of my prior attorney 2 months prior to a title search he did with HIS own company; it failed to state that his friend bought the lien to my home. I found this out by accident. The US Attorney is in dire need here. For Yonkers and the DA to DEMAND $10,000 for me reporting a Yonkers officer when I was assaulted is a serious concern; it gets worse. I invite any attonrey to come forward along with other victims. The DA receives federal funds for title fraud victims and refuses to assist me. The Asst NYS AG told me that the DA had a duty to refer me to another county if they refused to help.The attorney,Herbert N. Posner, who committed fraud on my home was found guilty by the STATE is still not being prosecuted by DA DiFiore while the DA is still demanding that my face be deemed a crime, a facila expression-first amendment violation. Please contact me to help- any victim or attonrey. Thank you, and god help us all.
I ask for all falsely accused and for victims of title fraud to come forward. This is also an invitation for any first amendment attorney to help show that a facial expression like free speech is a first amendment right. My FACE cannot be criminalized as Yonkers and the DA did.The next step is to criminalize people too white, too black, a drippy nose, a cleft lip. An order of protection cannot say a person's face is casue for jail. To the US the My email is

Anonymous said...

Genial fill someone in on and this enter helped me alot in my college assignement. Thank you as your information.

Anonymous said...

Hello all

Mansour Engineering committed to creating quality finished projects for Mansour Engineering clients

[url=] click here to go to Mansour Engineering[/url]

Anonymous said...

Hello all

Go to to have a FREE advance ebay to sell your produts. is the future of E-commerce to buy direct from the manufacturer and sell direct to consumers FREE. Their service is rock solid and most important 100% FREE

About Me